Dem double Standard

Classic analysis of the Dem's double standard on Moore and Kerry

I'M sure John Kerry must have de manded that the Democratic Party condemn Michael Moore and "Fahrenheit 911" for attacking President Bush.
He must have said he would disassociate himself from both the movie and the director because of the numerous deceptions and outright lies contained in that "documentary." He must have characterized Moore's attempt to denigrate the president as a "fear and smear" campaign. Right?

After all, with the release of "Unfit For Command," which casts doubt on the veracity of Kerry's Vietnam War recollections, we see a candidate, a party and a left-leaning media demanding that president Bush condemn author John O'Neill.
Since fair is fair, I suppose that O'Neill should get a seat of honor at next week's Republican convention — like Moore sitting next to former president Jimmy Carter when the Democrats convened in Boston. Right?

In reality, the senator and his soulmates are furious that anyone would dare to question a combat veteran's (John Kerry's) memories of war — and they express that fury by questioning a combat veteran's (John O'Neill's) memories of war.
Michael Moore remains above reproach, but John O'Neill is an unmitigated liar. A hypocritical double-standard? Right!